dpjc

Entries categorized as ‘characters’

Chat Characters

January 3, 2004 · Leave a Comment


Our theory is that the tortured writing by rightwingers happens because they are just really not very sharp. They employ lazy reading skills; then, using lazy thinking, they incorrectly digest what they read. To further complicate matters, they then lazily post their ill-conceived and illogical thoughts using sloppy writing skills.

Then, combine that with the fact that they get their news from such unreliable sources as Fox and Limbaugh. Hell, it’s a recipe for disaster.

It’s a form of intellectual laziness. They don’t read avidly; and when they do read, they miscomprehend what they read. Then, because they lack practice in the sort of critical thinking good reading requires, they employ sloppy thinking in evaluating what they thought they read. Add to these impairments their proclivity toward dishonesty and just plain meanness, and – well, you get the drift.

Here are a few of the characters:

We’re constantly in search of new rightwingers because Natchez and I have worn out the old ones.

Back to Top

Categories: characters

Hubby Flips Out

January 2, 2004 · Leave a Comment

Once in a while
some really goofy stuff happens.
Like some chatter will
put her husband on line
to threaten legal action. *S*

Hubby Threatens Legal Action!

MistySea~~ . . . . Line #5424 . . . . Thu, Jun 8, 12:31PM PDT He is lying through is teeth max – he lifted the pic when I posted it!! He is the lowest form of life and he will be sorry for this act. When my hsuband comes home – he will flip out – we are heading that way in three weeks – no doubt he will want to look up mr doss. He will rue this day.

[Editor's Note: Yep, I'd say he flipped out alright!] One of the hazards of running a peace and justice center – - threats like this one. It just goes with the job. By the way, they didn’t look me up, but he did send me a nasty note. *S*

*GUEST* Bob – MistySea’s Husband . . . . Line #5084 . . . . Thu, Jun 8, 5:11PM PDT My name is Bob and I am Misty’s husband. Doss . . . , I came in this evening to speak to you about what occurred here earlier today. It is my understanding that you pilfered a picture that my wife had posted months ago of our daughter, and posted that picture today with sexually suggestive rhetoric.

I have read your remarks. They are obscene and reprehensible. I strongly maintain that should you ever post my daughter’s picture in this or any chat site, and I become aware of it, I will contact my attorney and proper action will be taken. I am outraged that this occurred. It is beyond my comprehension how a grown man could comport oneself in such a manner.

[Editor's note: Sorry, Bob. Freedom of the press and all. This is one good looking gal, and she dresses up the peace and justice center newsletter quite nicely. Besides, with Misty's history of posting fake photographs, why should anyone believe this is really her daughter?]

Back to Top

Categories: characters

Misty Sea

January 2, 2004 · Leave a Comment


Misty Sea is well known
for posting uncited opinion
as fact in the chatroom.
If you question her source
or the information in the articles that she posts,
she becomes defensive,
however she makes no attempt
to verify the information herself.

The Scoop on Misty Sea:

She is apparently easy to convince, if the opinion of the writer has a similar political belief. She requires no facts and is even not troubled if the facts show that her opinion is mistaken. A woman who has an unshakable faith like this would be a great asset to a propaganda machine like the Republican Party.

She damages her usefulness, however, by posting a picture of Bob Barr and herself that is obviously a fake. When she was confronted about this, she mumbled the excuse that she faked the photo because she had had a bad hair day when she met the congressman. But she really really did meet the congressman.

Perhaps one of the funniest things Misty has done was when she put her husband on line to threaten legal action against the peace and justice center. We told him to have his lawyers contact our lawyers and that was the end of that.

She’s had some other interesting moments like when she told us Mike Espy had been convicted:

MistySea~~Give Me One Moment In Time . . . . Line number 5463 . . . . Mon, Nov 22, 12:28PM PST Espy was indicted and pled guilty – was Natchez in Bulgaria when that happened?

[Uh-oh! Compare Misty's Claim to what REALLY happened!]

["Former Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy, forced out of office in 1994 by allegations that he improperly took gifts from businesses and lobbyists, was acquitted Wednesday of 30 corruption charges brought against him by an independent counsel whom Espy likened to a ``schoolyard bully.'' Espy pumped his fist in jubilation as the jury forewoman announced the verdicts in U.S. District Court. Thirty times she looked at the verdict form and declared ``not guilty'' as independent counsel Donald Smaltz and his team of lawyers sat in silence.

As the litany continued, Espy turned to his lawyers and whispered, ``I knew it, I knew it.'' Moments later, outside the courthouse, Espy called the acquittal a long-sought vindication. He declared that it was a repudiation of Smaltz, who spent more than four years and $17 million on a wide-ranging investigation, and said Smaltz's case illustrates flaws in the independent counsel law that should be changed. " Espy is acquitted of corruption on all 30 charges." , Minneapolis Star Tribune, 12-03-1998, pp 01A.]

Special thanks to the peace and justic center “Roving Reporter” for this profile on our friend, Misty.

Back to Top

Categories: characters

Chat Characters

January 2, 2004 · Leave a Comment


Our theory is that the tortured writing by rightwingers happens because they are just really not very sharp. They employ lazy reading skills; then, using lazy thinking, they incorrectly digest what they read. To further complicate matters, they then lazily post their ill-conceived and illogical thoughts using sloppy writing skills.

Then, combine that with the fact that they get their news from such unreliable sources as Fox and Limbaugh. Hell, it’s a recipe for disaster.

It’s a form of intellectual laziness. They don’t read avidly; and when they do read, they miscomprehend what they read. Then, because they lack practice in the sort of critical thinking good reading requires, they employ sloppy thinking in evaluating what they thought they read. Add to these impairments their proclivity toward dishonesty and just plain meanness, and – well, you get the drift.

Here are a few of the characters:

We’re constantly in search of new rightwingers because Natchez and I have worn out the old ones.

Back to Top

Categories: characters

Hubby Flips Out

January 2, 2004 · Leave a Comment

Once in a while
some really goofy stuff happens.
Like some chatter will
put her husband on line
to threaten legal action. *S*

Hubby Threatens Legal Action!

MistySea~~ . . . . Line #5424 . . . . Thu, Jun 8, 12:31PM PDT He is lying through is teeth max – he lifted the pic when I posted it!! He is the lowest form of life and he will be sorry for this act. When my hsuband comes home – he will flip out – we are heading that way in three weeks – no doubt he will want to look up mr doss. He will rue this day.

[Editor's Note: Yep, I'd say he flipped out alright!] One of the hazards of running a peace and justice center – - threats like this one. It just goes with the job. By the way, they didn’t look me up, but he did send me a nasty note. *S*

*GUEST* Bob – MistySea’s Husband . . . . Line #5084 . . . . Thu, Jun 8, 5:11PM PDT My name is Bob and I am Misty’s husband. Doss . . . , I came in this evening to speak to you about what occurred here earlier today. It is my understanding that you pilfered a picture that my wife had posted months ago of our daughter, and posted that picture today with sexually suggestive rhetoric.

I have read your remarks. They are obscene and reprehensible. I strongly maintain that should you ever post my daughter’s picture in this or any chat site, and I become aware of it, I will contact my attorney and proper action will be taken. I am outraged that this occurred. It is beyond my comprehension how a grown man could comport oneself in such a manner.

[Editor's note: Sorry, Bob. Freedom of the press and all. This is one good looking gal, and she dresses up the peace and justice center newsletter quite nicely. Besides, with Misty's history of posting fake photographs, why should anyone believe this is really her daughter?]

Back to Top

Categories: characters

Misty Sea

January 2, 2004 · Leave a Comment


Misty Sea is well known
for posting uncited opinion
as fact in the chatroom.
If you question her source
or the information in the articles that she posts,
she becomes defensive,
however she makes no attempt
to verify the information herself.

The Scoop on Misty Sea:

She is apparently easy to convince, if the opinion of the writer has a similar political belief. She requires no facts and is even not troubled if the facts show that her opinion is mistaken. A woman who has an unshakable faith like this would be a great asset to a propaganda machine like the Republican Party.

She damages her usefulness, however, by posting a picture of Bob Barr and herself that is obviously a fake. When she was confronted about this, she mumbled the excuse that she faked the photo because she had had a bad hair day when she met the congressman. But she really really did meet the congressman.

Perhaps one of the funniest things Misty has done was when she put her husband on line to threaten legal action against the peace and justice center. We told him to have his lawyers contact our lawyers and that was the end of that.

She’s had some other interesting moments like when she told us Mike Espy had been convicted:

MistySea~~Give Me One Moment In Time . . . . Line number 5463 . . . . Mon, Nov 22, 12:28PM PST Espy was indicted and pled guilty – was Natchez in Bulgaria when that happened?

[Uh-oh! Compare Misty's Claim to what REALLY happened!]

["Former Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy, forced out of office in 1994 by allegations that he improperly took gifts from businesses and lobbyists, was acquitted Wednesday of 30 corruption charges brought against him by an independent counsel whom Espy likened to a ``schoolyard bully.'' Espy pumped his fist in jubilation as the jury forewoman announced the verdicts in U.S. District Court. Thirty times she looked at the verdict form and declared ``not guilty'' as independent counsel Donald Smaltz and his team of lawyers sat in silence.

As the litany continued, Espy turned to his lawyers and whispered, ``I knew it, I knew it.'' Moments later, outside the courthouse, Espy called the acquittal a long-sought vindication. He declared that it was a repudiation of Smaltz, who spent more than four years and $17 million on a wide-ranging investigation, and said Smaltz's case illustrates flaws in the independent counsel law that should be changed. " Espy is acquitted of corruption on all 30 charges." , Minneapolis Star Tribune, 12-03-1998, pp 01A.]

Special thanks to the peace and justic center “Roving Reporter” for this profile on our friend, Misty.

Back to Top

Categories: characters

parpus

January 2, 2004 · Leave a Comment


He once offered
to suck a senator’s dick
if the price was right.

Does this look like the writing of a mature and intelligent adult?

PRAPIUS Liberals are 100% idiots . . . . Line #9104 . . . . Tue, May 2, 4:13PM PST archaeopat…..what would make me smart?….sucking on Clintons short little pecker.

A strange case indeed, Prapius charms the room with his inimitable low-class wit, a constant barrage of references to body parts – - especially men’s rear ends, and with an intellect that rivals that of a dung beetle.

Claiming semi-retirement and astronomical wealth, most believe Prapius actually lives in the basement of his mother’s home. Prapius once bragged of a keen ability in math; thinking this was amusing, the author challenged Prapius to a simple math quiz taken from a freshman text book. Prapius flunked.

Pitied by many and ignored by most, Prapius’s claim to fame derives from never having in his life ever uttered a word that could even be remotely construed as an intelligible argument.

Back to Top

Categories: characters

parpus

January 2, 2004 · Leave a Comment


He once offered
to suck a senator’s dick
if the price was right.

Does this look like the writing of a mature and intelligent adult?

PRAPIUS Liberals are 100% idiots . . . . Line #9104 . . . . Tue, May 2, 4:13PM PST archaeopat…..what would make me smart?….sucking on Clintons short little pecker.

A strange case indeed, Prapius charms the room with his inimitable low-class wit, a constant barrage of references to body parts – - especially men’s rear ends, and with an intellect that rivals that of a dung beetle.

Claiming semi-retirement and astronomical wealth, most believe Prapius actually lives in the basement of his mother’s home. Prapius once bragged of a keen ability in math; thinking this was amusing, the author challenged Prapius to a simple math quiz taken from a freshman text book. Prapius flunked.

Pitied by many and ignored by most, Prapius’s claim to fame derives from never having in his life ever uttered a word that could even be remotely construed as an intelligible argument.

Back to Top

Categories: characters

robjak

January 2, 2004 · Leave a Comment


Robjak is a typical example of a Christian Conservative who attempts to convince other chatters of the moral superiority of his perspective by beating them over the head with long, rambling posts. Failing that, he dismisses chatters that disagree with his logic with a Bah! And off he goes, on and on and on and on.

His one redeeming quality is that he shows us what Palerider’s posts would look like if Pale were a fire-breathing Bible-thumper. Both apparently went to the same school of grammarian nonsense.

Surely in his daily life, contact with other human beings requires him to have superhuman control of his temper in order to stay out of jails and other instititutions. If you see this character on the street, you would be well advised to steer clear.

Back to Top

Categories: characters

Palerider

January 2, 2004 · Leave a Comment


Palerider Blows Hard; Makes Himself Dizzy

Looking for a good laugh? Look no further. Palerider keeps the room in stitches with his chronic wordiness made even more confusing by his total disregard for common rules of punctuation.

Employing tortured grammar, sloppy reading skills, and phony indignation, Pale pontificates and holds forth in a comical style rarely making sense, and almost invariably racheting into high level hysterics, complete with silly name-calling and delusions of weird grandeur.

Pale is famous for blaming Reagan/Bush defense cuts on Governor Clinton; for making up weird statements never uttered by Judge Wright in Arkansas; for falsely claiming that Clinton “embraced” Larry Flynt; and for getting completely tangled up in his confabulated telling of what Newt “REALLY” said about letting Medicare wither on the vine.

Of course, he’s easy pickings; it’s like shooting fish in a barrel. Check this out this exchange:

First I laid the trap.:

6008 PM: Doss — Fri, Jun 16 1:00pm pst
Pale: So what do you call someone who says the president should lay out a timetable for our troops withdrawal?

He walked right in.

6020 PM: Palerider — Fri, Jun 16 1:02pm pst
Palerider
. . . one wouuld be surrender monkey . . .


From the 2000 election campaign:

“I think it’s also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn.” – - George W. Bush

http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=855179

There you have it. Pale thinks Bush is a “surrender monkey.”

A fan of pictures of shiny and powerful weaponry, some wonder if Pale suffers from extreme self-esteem problems or gross insecurities about his own sexuality. Whatever problems underlying Pale’s wired to the max posting style, he’s beloved for reminding us that more is not necessarily better when it comes to stringing together nonsensical sentence fragments.

Back to Top

Categories: characters